Who am I?

If you walk in a forest you are influenced by the trees and the sun and so on...
And you will influence the forest too...

How you behave to other people and animals will pass over to them and spread in time....

But its probably impossible to hold on to things, people or pets or even to yourself

Everything will melt away like snow;



It's more easy to accept that everything change  if you sometimes can feel that there are no independent self, and it has never been...

When we were very small we could feel this naturally. The body of our mother and our body felt as if it was the same...

When we get older we loose that feeling - but try to reach it again through sexuality....

When we get even older we might understand that concepts  like "me" and "you" can fool us.

We need them and the names we have, but that doesn't mean that we are closed entities ...

We are both individuals and  one with everything....

There are two realities. And I think the world interacting binds them together.

So the question "Who am I?" is very hard to answer. Who am I today might be more easy to answer, but still; we are more tendencies than solid things. And those tendencies can come from older generations. And we can have tendencies that contradict each other.

The author Dostoevsky could describe us like that in his novels; the characters have inner dialogs with themselves but they are not definite. They have no essence or true inner voice.

 But some things that have followed me like kind friends since childhood;

The sunshine, the warm winds and the water in a clean lake.

Belongs to no one and to everyone....



An then; the acts we do will live much longer then we do... The way we behave, event toward nature is very important....


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cora Diamond on eating animals - with the help of Wittgenstein´s ideas

Image
Cora Diamond is a new name for me, even if she has worked as a professor in Philosophy in the states for a long time and is still  teaching at the university of Virginia, even she is over 80 years old. She has written a lot about Wittgenstein and that has helped her to express her view of the topic. Although she, like Wittgenstein,  has lived in a hut in Norway - and actually brought Tractatus with hes - she seems to be different and for sure more glad than W. Anyways, its W: s writings that interests her and especially his critics of metaphysics and ethics in philosophy. As it is said in Tractacus  : " Whereof one  cannot speak , thereof one must be silent." And of ethics philosophy should not speak - why? Is it like in Buddhism - its better to sit in silence and let know yourself, than to speculate about what will happen when we die? But for sure there ethical guidelines in Buddhism,  but the behaviors is often named skilful, not good (or bad). Another
Read more

I think, therefore I am NOT

Image
So Descartes was wrong. He said that he could doubt everything about himself except that he was thinking. That proved that he existed. The word "I" is the central point here. What does it mean? Perhaps we are sure that we know the answer. Is it the thoughts? In that case - where are you when you aren't thinking? Is it your job, your title? In that case - what happens if you loose your job or change job? Is it your house, your nation? Under my course to be a mindfulness instructor, the teacher, Ola Schenström, made us ask to each other; "Who are you?" After each answer the question was repeated by the questioner.We soon discovered that there were no end to the answers - or maybe an adequate end could be; "I don't know."Or maybe; "It seems I have no essence." Other thinkers have come to the same conclusions; Buddha, Sartre and more recently Damasio and Parfit. Sartre, for instance, has said that we are the sum of our actions. We ha
Read more

Wittgenstein and Buddha -buddies?

Image
Ludwig Wittgenstein, the famous philosopher, reflected in the posthumously published  book "Philosophical Investigations" about the picture above; Is it a hare or duck?  He meant that we make, or must make, a statement what it is. And I suppose he meant that we often or always has to interpret the world around us. But two different interpretations can both be right! Language and thoughts controls what we see.....   You can compare with the picture of a glass. Half empty or half empty?  Who decides? Yes, it's you... And whatever you say is right.  But you can be aware of what you think. That can say more of yourself than of the glass....  You can be aware of that you always do interpretations of things that happens.  If you have a pessimistic or a naive point of view, you can be aware of the view and your statements.  Buddha and Wittgenstein were both aware of that different persons uses different perspectives.  But Buddha spoke about the "right 
Read more