Can a river be a person?
If there is a subject, must therefore be an object? Well if you study grammar it seems to be so. I give you a banana, I'm the doer, the subject. But lets say that we are interrelated. Lets, for instance say that we are nature. Is that a good way to protect nature? Maybe, but we now live in Anthropocene. We have influenced the the whole surface of the earth. We are the strong part now, but that may make us sad too. We cannot longer count on nature as something immense that will always be there for us to use. We have to care for nature as an old mother. We have been her naughty child and now she is in danger. Without her we will be lost too. So maybe each one of us can be a guardian for birds, insects and fish. But some insects shall have a value even if they not are good for us. We have knowledges that a tree or a bird have not. We are in a way superior - anyway if we really starts to behave starts to behave like homo sapiens. Maybe, in the long run, we can invent te