Invisible gorillas

  If you click on the picture you will see a review of the book from The Guardian.
Daniel Kahneman has written an interesting book about thoughts.
He means that our brain more is designed for a life in the jungle, than for a modern life.
Our intuition or gut-feeling often leads us in the wrong way - because of that. Because those feelings are programmed in us from long ago...
So fast thinking i often not so good.
And this fast and impulsive thinking is what we are trying to be aware of with the help of mindfulness. By being aware of them, we don't have to be trapped by them...
Kahneman writes that we also have another way of thinking - Kahneman calls it system 2, it's when we concentrate on something and perhaps make an analyse of  it.We often think that this kind of thinking is the I. 
But experiments has shown that we often are guided by the gut-feeling and chance. We really don't know who we are.
When we concentrate of something we often, misses a lot. So the thinking of system 1, can be adequate even outside of  the jungle. This experiment shows the phenomena.
http://theinvisiblegorilla.com/videos.html

But by the knowledge we have today - we don´t have to be afraid of gorillas. So we can more often concentrate on a problem and then hopefully make better choices.
Kahneman writes that we better think things over and search for evidence, and that is true also for mindfulness....

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cora Diamond on eating animals - with the help of Wittgenstein´s ideas

Image
Cora Diamond is a new name for me, even if she has worked as a professor in Philosophy in the states for a long time and is still  teaching at the university of Virginia, even she is over 80 years old. She has written a lot about Wittgenstein and that has helped her to express her view of the topic. Although she, like Wittgenstein,  has lived in a hut in Norway - and actually brought Tractatus with hes - she seems to be different and for sure more glad than W. Anyways, its W: s writings that interests her and especially his critics of metaphysics and ethics in philosophy. As it is said in Tractacus  : " Whereof one  cannot speak , thereof one must be silent." And of ethics philosophy should not speak - why? Is it like in Buddhism - its better to sit in silence and let know yourself, than to speculate about what will happen when we die? But for sure there ethical guidelines in Buddhism,  but the behaviors is often named skilful, not good (or bad). Another
Read more

I think, therefore I am NOT

Image
So Descartes was wrong. He said that he could doubt everything about himself except that he was thinking. That proved that he existed. The word "I" is the central point here. What does it mean? Perhaps we are sure that we know the answer. Is it the thoughts? In that case - where are you when you aren't thinking? Is it your job, your title? In that case - what happens if you loose your job or change job? Is it your house, your nation? Under my course to be a mindfulness instructor, the teacher, Ola Schenström, made us ask to each other; "Who are you?" After each answer the question was repeated by the questioner.We soon discovered that there were no end to the answers - or maybe an adequate end could be; "I don't know."Or maybe; "It seems I have no essence." Other thinkers have come to the same conclusions; Buddha, Sartre and more recently Damasio and Parfit. Sartre, for instance, has said that we are the sum of our actions. We ha
Read more

Wittgenstein and Buddha -buddies?

Image
Ludwig Wittgenstein, the famous philosopher, reflected in the posthumously published  book "Philosophical Investigations" about the picture above; Is it a hare or duck?  He meant that we make, or must make, a statement what it is. And I suppose he meant that we often or always has to interpret the world around us. But two different interpretations can both be right! Language and thoughts controls what we see.....   You can compare with the picture of a glass. Half empty or half empty?  Who decides? Yes, it's you... And whatever you say is right.  But you can be aware of what you think. That can say more of yourself than of the glass....  You can be aware of that you always do interpretations of things that happens.  If you have a pessimistic or a naive point of view, you can be aware of the view and your statements.  Buddha and Wittgenstein were both aware of that different persons uses different perspectives.  But Buddha spoke about the "right 
Read more