Sad and lost?

Sometimes we all feel sad and lost. And a dark pattern of thoughts are seeking for us.
Perhaps we are familiar with the pattern, perhaps not. But we can be familiar with it.
But it's best to do it with sympathy.
And to do that, it's necessary to start with a smile... a smile to yourself and the world. After a while the smile will spread to your eyes. Take some deep breaths and follow them with your mind. Then look at your thoughts and smile to them too. You can say "hallo" to them, and then "goodbye"...

As Thich Nhat Hanh use to say, especially  to young people; don't let one thought spoil your life. If you lose your job or your loved one, it's easy to let the feeling of despair guide you. But new feelings, new thoughts will come, perhaps next day... And perhaps the experience will deepen your compassion...

Everything changes and brakes apart- even your thoughts.

It's so important to know this - you are not your thought patterns. 

Sometimes I used say to myself; "I'm so tired of myself".

But what is "myself". Is it a solid block or more like a wave, changing all the time, and always in contact with the rest of the water?

We are just alone if we identify ourselves with our thoughts.

Sometimes we need them and should use them. Other times they are just unnecessary.

You can ask yourself; Is this thought constructive? Shall I ponder about it? Shall I let it out to other: What can happen. Will it make life easier for me and other people or relatives as animals? Especially in the long run... If not; leave it.. and you can do it with just concentrating on the breath. Or, if possible, take a walk in nature. And after while more constructive thoughts probably will arrive  - like new trains on a station - you can again choose to board it or not....









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cora Diamond on eating animals - with the help of Wittgenstein´s ideas

Image
Cora Diamond is a new name for me, even if she has worked as a professor in Philosophy in the states for a long time and is still  teaching at the university of Virginia, even she is over 80 years old. She has written a lot about Wittgenstein and that has helped her to express her view of the topic. Although she, like Wittgenstein,  has lived in a hut in Norway - and actually brought Tractatus with hes - she seems to be different and for sure more glad than W. Anyways, its W: s writings that interests her and especially his critics of metaphysics and ethics in philosophy. As it is said in Tractacus  : " Whereof one  cannot speak , thereof one must be silent." And of ethics philosophy should not speak - why? Is it like in Buddhism - its better to sit in silence and let know yourself, than to speculate about what will happen when we die? But for sure there ethical guidelines in Buddhism,  but the behaviors is often named skilful, not good (or bad). Another
Read more

I think, therefore I am NOT

Image
So Descartes was wrong. He said that he could doubt everything about himself except that he was thinking. That proved that he existed. The word "I" is the central point here. What does it mean? Perhaps we are sure that we know the answer. Is it the thoughts? In that case - where are you when you aren't thinking? Is it your job, your title? In that case - what happens if you loose your job or change job? Is it your house, your nation? Under my course to be a mindfulness instructor, the teacher, Ola Schenström, made us ask to each other; "Who are you?" After each answer the question was repeated by the questioner.We soon discovered that there were no end to the answers - or maybe an adequate end could be; "I don't know."Or maybe; "It seems I have no essence." Other thinkers have come to the same conclusions; Buddha, Sartre and more recently Damasio and Parfit. Sartre, for instance, has said that we are the sum of our actions. We ha
Read more

Wittgenstein and Buddha -buddies?

Image
Ludwig Wittgenstein, the famous philosopher, reflected in the posthumously published  book "Philosophical Investigations" about the picture above; Is it a hare or duck?  He meant that we make, or must make, a statement what it is. And I suppose he meant that we often or always has to interpret the world around us. But two different interpretations can both be right! Language and thoughts controls what we see.....   You can compare with the picture of a glass. Half empty or half empty?  Who decides? Yes, it's you... And whatever you say is right.  But you can be aware of what you think. That can say more of yourself than of the glass....  You can be aware of that you always do interpretations of things that happens.  If you have a pessimistic or a naive point of view, you can be aware of the view and your statements.  Buddha and Wittgenstein were both aware of that different persons uses different perspectives.  But Buddha spoke about the "right 
Read more